Let’s put three popular VM provisioning approaches to test!
In theory, launching a virtual machine should take minutes. In practice, it often takes hours, sometimes days.
Sure, you can click through a wizard, pick a region and instance size, and get a VM running quickly. But the hard part is doing it consistently across different clouds, with no standardization between their consoles.
Even harder is enforcing governance, which is why many organizations use ticket queues and manual approvals. It slows things down – from minutes to days – and makes provisioning more painful than it has to be.
So, in this post, we’re putting three popular VM provisioning approaches to test:
Let’s break down how each stacks up.
Major cloud providers, like AWS, Azure, and GCP, all provide native management consoles that let you provision cloud compute via a GUI-based interface. They are visual, accessible, and familiar – but hit a wall when you’re operating at scale or across clouds.
Here’s where native consoles fall short:
It’s the IaC tool of choice for most DevOps and Platform engineers. You can write custom code to deploy infrastructure at scale, repeatedly and across cloud providers.
But Terraform’s powerful capabilities come at the cost of ease-of-use.
emma is a no-code, cloud-agnostic platform that offers click-to-deploy capabilities across all cloud providers. It makes VM provisioning truly self-service – no YAMLs, no scripts, no ticket queues.
Here’s how emma stands out:
Stop provisioning like it’s 2015! emma gives you the speed of native cloud consoles and the power of Terraform, and true multi-cloud standardization, all in one platform.